CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1659 OF 2005
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Stamp Duty Exemption"
170 result(s) found
Found 170 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Disqualification in Public Works Contract — Petitioner's Bid Rejected for Non-Upload of Scanned Copy of Registration Certificate Despite Having Original. Court holds that rejection for non-upload of scanned copy of Registration of Firm from original, when original was available, was arbitrary and directed opening of financial bid.
5 Dec 2014The petitioner, Khare & Tarkunde Infrastructure Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of its t...
- 152
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Period of Bona Fide Prosecution of Earlier Proceedings Excluded for Limitation Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court permitted the plaintiff to amend the plaint to seek exclusion of time spent in prosecuting a suit and appeal in the Small Causes Court, holding that such amendment is necessary for determining the real controversy and does not change the nature of the suit.
10 May 2013The plaintiff, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), filed a suit for specific performance against the defendants in the Bombay High Court. The su...
- 178
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Will in Testamentary Suit and Examines Constitutional Validity of Hindu Succession Act Provisions. The Court Found the Handwritten Will Validly Executed and Considered Whether Sections 8 and 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Discriminate on Grounds of Gender in Succession Matters.
6 Nov 2012The judgment involved two testamentary suits before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. In Testamentary Suit No. 48 of 2005, the plaintiff claimed...
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case: High Court Erred in Reappreciating Evidence Beyond Revisional Jurisdiction. Presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.
2 Apr 2025The appellant-complainant alleged that he advanced a loan of Rs.22,00,000 to the respondent-accused, who issued a cheque dated 17.03.2010 for the same...
- 1171
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Subsidy Under Goa State Investment Scheme 1990 — Paints Unit Not Registered Before Cut-off Date. Inclusion of 'paints' in ineligible list held valid and not ultra vires.
26 Sep 2019The petitioner, Berger Becker Coatings Pvt. Ltd., a paint manufacturing company, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that it was entitled to s...
- 123
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Quashing of Bribery Charges — Demand and Acceptance Deemed Sine Qua Non Under Sections 7 and 7A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Mere Recovery of Currency Notes from Accused Public Servant Insufficient to Sustain Charges Under Sections 7(a), 7A, and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
20 Dec 2023The Karnataka High Court considered a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of proceedings in Special (SVC) No...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint in Suit Alleging Unauthorized Alienation of Joint Family Property by Father. Limitation Period Under Section 109 of Limitation Act, 1963 Raised as Defence.
17 Oct 2025The matter arises from an Interim Application filed by Defendant No.1, Mantri Building Condominium, seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Ru...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.
29 Oct 2013The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...
- 103
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.
4 May 2018The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...
- 78
