Search Results for "Special Court (POCSO)"

479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramprasad s/o Fagulal Amdare, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO Act, Nagpur, for offences under Section 6 read with Section 5(n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Sexual Assault of Minor Girl Under POCSO Act and IPC. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence, Despite Absence of Independent Witnesses.

The appellant, Babu @ Prabhakar Sakharam Karve, was convicted by the Designated Judge under the POCSO Act, Greater Mumbai, in POCSO Special Case No.48...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajratan Sahebrao Nawghare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.10/2013 for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of POCSO Act set aside as testimonies of child victims were contradictory and unsupported by medical evidence.

The appellant, Navin Dhaniram Baraiye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case No. 218/2016 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony. Victim's Admission of Voluntary Association and Contradictions in Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt Under Section 366 IPC and Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Popat Navasu Bendkoli, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Nashik, for offences under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in POCSO Case, Upholds 14-Year Sentence for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on Minor. Evidence of Child Victim and Mother Found Credible, Corroborated by Medical and DNA Evidence, Conviction Under Section 6 POCSO Act and Section 342 IPC Affirmed.

The appellant, Kailas Gangaprasad Yadav, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Greater Mumbai, in POCSO Special Case No. 266 of 2014...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove penetrative sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kishor Shankar Palve, was convicted by the Special Court and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 3 punish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Sexual Assault of Minor under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Kundan Shivshankar Fating, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Wardha, for offences under Section 8 read with Secti...