Search Results for "Senior Advocate designation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Senior Advocate designation"

303 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Delivers Oral Judgment in Section 11 Arbitration Application Relating to License Agreement. The Application Arose from Disputes under a License Agreement Dated August 25, 2016, and Was Heard by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan on June 17, 2025.

17 Jun 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, presided over by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, delivered an oral judgment on June 17, 2025, on two arbitratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Conviction in Robbery Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 313 CrPC — Failure to Put Incriminating Evidence to Accused Renders Trial Unfair. The appellate court's conversion of acquittal into conviction was quashed as the accused were not given an opportunity to explain the evidence under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

4 Apr 2024

The applicants, originally accused Nos. 1 to 4, were tried by the Court of JMFC, Cantonment Court, Pune for offences punishable under Sections 392, 39...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Building Permission Due to Playground Reservation Under MRTP Act. Notice Under Section 127 Held Not Premature as 10-Year Period for Acquisition Had Expired.

13 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Irfan Allabaksh Shaikh, owned land bearing CTS No. 6167 in Siddheshwar Peth, Solapur, which was reserved as a playground (site No. 319...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors Not in Charge of Company Affairs at Relevant Time Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Specific Averments Under Section 141.

16 Jan 2019

The case involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by H.S. Bedi (petitioner in Crl.P.No.6...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors Not In Charge of or Responsible for Conduct of Business at Relevant Time Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

16 Jan 2019

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Mr. H.S. Bedi (Managing Director) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Rejecting Stamp Duty Objection. Arbitrator has power to impound insufficiently stamped agreement under Section 33 of Maharashtra Stamp Act as a person in charge of a public office.

23 Aug 2018

The petitioners, Milind Dattatraya Mahajan and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 8.4.2018 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction for Arbitration Matters Lies with Court Where Place of Arbitration Is Located, Not Where Prior Applications Were Filed. The Court Relied on the Principle That the Designation of a Seat of Arbitration Is an Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause Under Section 42 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Jul 2017

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by the Municipal Corporation for the Cities of Kalyan and Dombivli (Petitioner) challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion and Seniority in MIDC — Petitioner Granted Deemed Date of Promotion with Consequential Benefits. Court Holds That Sealed Cover Procedure Cannot Be Applied When No Punishment Is Imposed and That Promotion Must Be Granted from the Date of Eligibility.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Prabhakar Jagguji Rangari, joined the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) in 1978 as an Overseer and was promoted th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening — No Locus Standi Found as Society Was Not Owner of Land at Time of Acquisition. The court held that a party cannot challenge acquisition proceedings if it was not the owner at the time of acquisition.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, New Lotus Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acqu...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)