Search Results for "Security Cheque"

687 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 687 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt Liability. Complainant Bank Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Bidar Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Girish Kulkarni, by the trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Shifts Burden on Accused, Which Was Not Discharged.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammad Yusuf, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondent, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Complainant Company's Loan to Employee and Cheque Issuance for Repayment Established, Rebuttable Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Sami Labs Limited, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondent, M.V. Joseph, a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Dishonour of Cheque - Presumption under Section 139 rebutted by accused showing loan was time-barred, hence not legally enforceable.

The present revision petition was filed by the accused (petitioner) challenging her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Debt. Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, M/s. Pakdhane Cement House, through its proprietor Anandrao Shamrao Pakdhane, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of...