Search Results for "Section 96(4)"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Transport Corporation Reducing Compensation in Fatal Accident Case. Multiplier reduced from 13 to 7 for deceased aged 74, upholding 50% contributory negligence.

The case arises from a motor accident on 13.04.2012 when a bus owned by M/s. Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd. (appellant) and driven by respondent n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Family Pension Cannot Be Deducted from Loss of Dependency. The Court held that family pension is a separate benefit and not deductible from compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and applied correct multiplier based on deceased's age.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the widow and children of Tukaram Mohite, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 22.03.2010. The deceased was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Non-Disclosure of Arbitrators' Names Under Chamber Rules. Rule III(3) of Indian Chamber of Commerce Rules Upheld Not Violative of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 1964 between the appellant, Union Textile Traders, and the respondent, Shri Bhawani Cotton Mills Ltd., for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Tort Conspiracy Suit; Holds High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Revision. Release of One Joint Tort-feasor Not Validly Decided by High Court in Revision from Court-Fee Order.

The dispute arose from a suit for damages filed by the plaintiffs, who were members of an association, against the defendants, also members, alleging ...