Search Results for "Section 376(D)"

259 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 259 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The petitioner, Mohsin @ Height Rafikbhai Ansari, through his father Rafikbhai Pirmohammed Ansari, challenged the legality and validity of a preventiv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking Detenue's Activities to Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance of public order.

The petitioner, Alfaj @Altaf @Kaliyo Satarbhai Shaikh, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detention order dated 26.12.2025 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Aspak Shah @ Chachu, was preventively detained by an order dated 19.12.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere FIRs do not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order.

The petitioner, Aakib @ Gani Ganibhai Belim, was preventively detained by an order dated 29/01/2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad, unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in POCSO Case — State Appeal Against Inadequate Sentence Allowed. Court holds that Section 5(1) of POCSO Act mandates minimum sentence of ten years and trial court's imposition of less than ten years is illegal.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the inadequacy of the sentence imp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detenu's Past Offences Do Not Justify Detention Under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Rahulkumar S/o Hastimalji Jain, was preventively detained by an order dated 07.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order.

The petitioner, Imranhussain@Bhuriyo Kararhussain Momin, was preventively detained by an order dated 29.12.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Police, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detenue's alleged anti-social activities did not meet the threshold of 'dangerous person' under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Manisha D/o Patantaru @ Patantaal Naidu, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Surat, vide order dated 18/01/2026, und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order.

The petitioner, Radha W/o Udaya Velgu, was preventively detained by an order dated 18.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat City, under the...