Search Results for "Section 304A IPC"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits KSRTC Driver in Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Rash or Negligent Driving Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Culpable Rashness or Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohammad Hanif Jainum Khalifa, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). He was tried and convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Reinstatement of Bus Driver in Gross Negligence Case. The Industrial Court's finding that the bus driver was not negligent was based on evidence and not perverse, and thus no interference under Article 227 was warranted.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (BEST Undertaking), challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 16 August 2007,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing death by staged accident overturned as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder. The prosecution's case initially registered as an accident under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Driving License in Motor Vehicle Act Case — Lack of Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Petitioner's license suspended under Section 19(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 without prior notice or opportunity to show cause.

The petitioner, a driver employed with KSRTC, was involved in a road accident on 25.08.2014 while driving a bus. An FIR was registered under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Prosecution of Occupier and Factory Manager Under Factories Act, 1948 Due to Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. Deceased Cleaner of Transporter Held Not a 'Worker' Under Section 2(l) as He Was Not Employed by or Involved in Manufacturing Process of Factory.

The case involved a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the occupier and factory manager of Grasim In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death in Motor Accident Case. Appeal Dismissed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act.

The present appeal was filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. by the original accused No.1, Sanjay Bhavrao @ Baburao Sapkal, challenging his conviction in...