Search Results for "Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act"

269 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 269 result(s)

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeal Seeking Substitution of Director in Consumer Execution Proceedings During CIRP. Moratorium under Section 14 of IBC does not bar substitution of director as the corporate debtor remains liable.

23 Jun 2025

The case involves an appeal filed by Sudheschandra Gupta against an order dated 01.10.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mahara...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Bombay High Court Order Setting Aside Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A NI Act. Signatory of Cheque Authorized by Company is 'Drawer' Liable for Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 Jul 2024

The appellant company entered into agreements with Cane Agro Energy (India) Ltd. (Cane) and made advance payments of Rs.63,46,00,000/- for supply of s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SRA Acquisition Notice for Church Land, Upholds Owner's Preferential Right to Redevelop Slum. The Court held that the owner of slum land has a preferential right to redevelop the land under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority cannot acquire the land for a private developer without considering the owner's proposal.

11 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a public trust managing Mount Mary's Church in Bandra, Mumbai, owned land admeasuring 9371.30 sq. meters, out of which 1596.40 sq. met...

High Court

High Court Frames Charges Against Accused for Filing Frivolous Litigations; Supreme Court Dispenses with Trial in Contempt Case. Forum Shopping and Abuse of Process Held to Amount to Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

14 Jan 2022

The criminal contempt petition was filed by Hasham Investment and Trading Company Private Limited, Wipro Limited, and Azim Hasham Premji (complainants...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Summons Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments Under Section 141 NI Act. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 failed to allege that directors were in charge of and responsible for company's business at time of offence, making vicarious liability unsustainable and proceedings an abuse of process.

8 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals arising from special leave petitions against a common High Court judgment that dismissed petitions u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Quashing of Process Issued Under Section 138 NI Act Against Directors Due to Insolvency Moratorium and Insufficient Averments. Complaint Did Not Specify Role of Each Director and Cheques Were Presented After Moratorium Order Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

31 Aug 2018

Background: Two criminal applications under Section 482 CrPC were filed by nine directors of M/s. Amtek Auto Ltd. seeking quashing of process orders i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Company and Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 r/w 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Directors' Claim of Not Being In Charge of Business at Time of Cheque Issuance Fails to Rebut Presumption of Liability Under Section 141.

14 Mar 2017

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s. Jaimin Jewelery Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Accused No.1) and its directors, Gautam Mehta (Accu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Application to Recall Witness in NI Act Case — Cross-Examination Right Not Forfeited by Mere Absence on One Date. The court set aside acquittal and remanded for recall of complainant for cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC.

12 Sep 2013

The applicant, Pratap @ Prakash Kripaldas Chugh, was the original complainant in a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Process Against Accused in Section 138 NI Act Case. Cheque Drawer Alone Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Admission of Liability in Settlement Does Not Create Vicarious Liability.

2 Jul 2012

The petitioners, Banwarilal L. Saini and another, were accused nos.1 and 3 in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 138 NI Act and Directs Magistrates to Accept Complaints Without Preliminary Inquiry. Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is constitutionally valid and Section 200 CrPC does not require preliminary inquiry in cheque dishonour cases.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment arises from a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the p...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)