Search Results for "Section 140 Contract Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 140 Contract Act"

282 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 282 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Electricity Procurement Dispute, Upholding High Court's Direction for Power Purchase from Successful Bidders. The Court affirmed that the Request for Proposal process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003, is binding, and the reduction of procurement quantum from 1000 MW to 500 MW was invalid, requiring adherence to original bid outcomes.

8 Jan 2024

The dispute originated from Rajasthan's initiative to procure 1000 MW of electricity through a competitive bidding process under Section 63 of the Ele...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Diamond Bourse Suspension — Private Association's Internal Decisions Not Subject to Judicial Review. The court held that the Bharat Diamond Bourse, as a private company, had the right to regulate its membership and premises, and its actions were not amenable to writ jurisdiction or public law remedies.

16 Aug 2016

The plaintiffs, VSM Diamonds Pvt Ltd and three individuals, filed a suit against Bharat Diamond Bourse (BDB), a company incorporated under Section 25 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Finding that Crane Hirer is Not a 'Dealer' Under Lease Act. Transaction of Hiring Crane with Operator is a Works Contract, Not a Sale of Right to Use Goods.

21 Apr 2015

The case involves a reference under the Maharashtra Sales Tax on Transfer of Right to Use Any Goods for Any Purpose Act, 1985 (Lease Act). The respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Sep 2014

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable for Own Vehicle Accident Without Third Party Involvement. The court upheld the Tribunal's award of compensation to the mother of the deceased rider, finding no error in the decision.

17 Jun 2014

The case involves an appeal filed by the United India Insurance Company Ltd. under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit — Guarantee Not Limited to Three Years, Liability Joint and Several. The court held that the guarantor failed to prove the alleged limitation of three years and is jointly and severally liable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

12 Dec 2005

The case involves a first appeal filed by Padmakar Krushnarao Bhagwatkar, who was the guarantor/defendant No.2 in a suit filed by the State Bank of In...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Railways Act Case Regarding Sufficiency of Notice Under Section 77. The Court ruled that the requirement of notice under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, should be liberally construed and notice addressed to the Chief Commercial Manager (Claims and Refunds) was valid compliance.

7 Mar 1968

The dispute arose from a contract for carriage of goods by rail. The appellant, a consignor, booked goods for transportation from Sealdah station via ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)