Search Results for "Section 11"

200 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 200 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Termination of Procurement Agreement. Pre-Arbitral Negotiation Clause Held Not Mandatory Condition Precedent Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

This is an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Tech Mahindra Ltd. against Tata Communications Transfor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Unsigned Award Declared Invalid. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be signed by the officer; death of officer before signing renders award a nullity and land does not vest under Section 16.

The case involves a second appeal by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment of the District Court, Thane, which reversed the trial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications in International Commercial Arbitration — Habitual Residence Determined at Time of Agreement. Applicant Residing in UAE at Time of Agreement Held to be Habitually Resident Outside India Under Section 2(1)(f)(i) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Nominal Compensation of Rs.1 Set Aside. Market Value of Rs.6,417/sq.m. Awarded with Statutory Benefits Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Sadashiv Madhav Shelke, owned land Survey No.3/27 bearing City Survey No.908 admeasuring 258.18 sq. meters at Shirdi, Maharashtra. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Development Dispute — No Valid Arbitration Agreement Exists as Alleged Agreement Was Never Finalized or Executed by Both Parties.

The applicant, G.A. Builders Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Construction Dispute. Court at Ratnagiri, where cause of action arose, has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 2(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to entertain Section 34 petition.

The petitioner, Premlaxmi And Co., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Iron Ore Sale Dispute. The court held that the Section 9 application was within limitation and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s Shree Mallikarjun Shipping Pvt. Ltd., entered into a contract dated 25.2.2008 with the respondent, M/s Balaji Logistics Carriers, f...