Search Results for "Rule 4"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Karikho Kri's Election in Arunachal Pradesh: Non-Disclosure of Assets Not Grounds for Invalidating Election. Supreme Court reverses High Court ruling, finds no substantial defect or corrupt practice in Karikho Kri's election despite asset non-disclosures.

The Supreme Court of India set aside a High Court ruling that had declared the election of Karikho Kri void due to non-disclosure of certain assets an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Registrar's Refusal to Register Curative Petitions in Interest on Delayed Payments Act Case. Curative Petitions Cannot Be Entertained When Review Petitions Are Dismissed in Open Court, Not by Circulation, Under Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

The dispute originated from the maintainability of a suit under the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Revisional Order in Execution Proceedings. Decree Against Single Defendant Without Adjudication Held Null and Void Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VIII Rule 10, Rendering Execution Incompetent.

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the appellants under section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking a permanent injunction aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Addresses Caste Certificate Verification and Affinity Test in Scheduled Tribe Claims Under Maharashtra Act. The Court examines procedural guidelines and the role of affinity tests in determining caste claims, referencing prior judicial directives and legislative frameworks.

The dispute centered on the verification of caste certificates for Scheduled Tribes in Maharashtra, involving procedural guidelines and the role of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...