Search Results for "Recovery Panchanama"

1674 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1674 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Property Dispute Case. Circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen together, and false explanation held sufficient to convict under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The appellants, Savita Namdev Dethe (accused no.1) and Namdev Sadashiv Dethe (accused no.2), were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji @Shiva Shrimant Sonawane, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Sessions Case No. 440 of 2001 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 364, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dhananjay Janardhan Yadav, was convicted by the V Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the kidnapping and murder of his five-y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Satisfactory Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals arising from a single incident where a group of individuals allegedly formed an unlawful assembly a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 120B, 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to a criminal appeal filed by four accused persons convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere, in S.C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 201, 324, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 6, were convicted by the Ist Ad hoc Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, on 8.5.2007 in Sessions Case No.102 of 2006...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction for Rape and Murder and State\u2019s Appeals for Enhancement and Against Acquittal. Court Considers Circumstantial Evidence Linking Accused to Offences Under Sections 302, 376, 392, 201, 411, 414 IPC and Others.

Criminal Appeal No. 516 of 2012 was filed by accused Jawedkhan @ Tingrya against his conviction and sentence. Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2012 and Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction but Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient for Conviction but Case Does Not Fall in 'Rarest of Rare' Category

The case pertains to the confirmation of death sentence awarded to Anil Jagannath Pawar by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, in Sessions Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Conviction of Seven Accused in Murder-Robbery Case for Non-Compliance of Section 313 CrPC. Failure to Provide Proper Opportunity to Explain Incriminating Circumstances Under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Vitiates Trial.

The High Court of Bombay heard five criminal appeals arising from the conviction of seven accused under Section 396 read with Section 34 of the Indian...