Search Results for "Public Private Partnership"

849 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 849 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Challenge to Arbitral Award Directing Payment of Rs.9,28,188.45 with Interest. The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from a member-client dispute over stock market transactions and margin shortfalls.

The petitioner filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order Against Partnership Firm in BBMP Property Dispute — Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition of Building Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

The petitioners, M/s. Raghava Reddy and Associates, a partnership firm, along with its partners, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Lack of Notice Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Co-owners Not Served Individual Notice Before Acquisition for Irrigation Project, Violating Section 4(1) and Section 9(3) of the 1894 Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by three co-owners of agricultural land in Village Nere, Taluka Maval, District Pune, challenging the acquisit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Work Order in Public Tender Dispute Due to Arbitrary Evaluation and Non-Compliance with Tender Conditions. Court holds that the respondent authority's failure to adhere to the stipulated tender conditions and its arbitrary evaluation of bids vitiates the award of the work order.

The petitioner, M/s. Hitech Audio Systems Pvt. Ltd., challenged a work order issued by the 2nd respondent, the Chief Engineer (Electrical) of the Publ...