Search Results for "Promotees"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes HAL Circular Re-fixing Pay Notionally from 2017 — Violation of Natural Justice and Article 14. Employer's Unilateral Re-fixation of Pay Without Hearing Employees Held Arbitrary and Unenforceable.

The petitioner, Hindustan Aeronautics Officers Guild (HAOG), representing officers of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), filed a writ petition under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Technical Assistants as Assistant Engineers Without Statutory Amendment in Tamil Nadu Engineering Service Rules. Technical Assistants Cannot Be Appointed by Transfer Unless Rules Are Amended to Include Them as Feeder Category.

The Supreme Court considered a set of appeals challenging the judgment of the Madras High Court which had allowed the appointment of Technical Assista...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Compassionate Appointment Based on Ad-Hoc Promotee Father's Service. Compassionate appointment scheme does not extend to dependents of ad-hoc promotees whose promotion was never confirmed.

The petitioner, Nikhil Maruti Gosarade, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 25 June 2018, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion Due to Minor Penalty — Government Policy Upheld. Clause B of GR dated 15.12.2017, which denies promotion during currency of penalty, is not violative of Articles 14, 16, and 20(2) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Mohan Vasantrao Sangvikar, a Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Public Works Department, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Administr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Promotion of Respondent No.5 in Municipal Corporation Case Due to Ultra Vires Action. Promotion of A.T. Shintre as Director under Section 54A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 set aside for being illegal and arbitrary.

The petitioners, employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...