Search Results for "Prior User"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Prior User"

1073 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1073 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Filed by Accused Convicted for Murder and Robbery; Outcome Not Ascertainable from Extract. Appeal Challenged Life Sentence Imposed Under Sections 302 and 394 Read with Section 34 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence Involving Mobile Phone Tracking and Recoveries.

17 Oct 2018

The present criminal appeal was filed by Accused No.3, Gopinath Vitthal Sable, challenging his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Investigation Order Against Chief Secretary in Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act. Court held that no court can take cognizance of an offence under the Act without prior sanction for prosecution of a public servant, and the order under Section 156(3) CrPC directing investigation was invalid as it effectively bypassed the mandatory sanction requirement.

22 Apr 2019

The applicant, UPS Madan, who was the Additional Chief Secretary (Finance) and later Chief Secretary of Maharashtra, filed an application under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviewed Writ Petition Against IPAB Order Cancelling Pharmaceutical Trademark Registration. The Court Examined Whether Rectification Application Was Maintainable Under Section 124 Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Whether IPAB Correctly Applied Deceptive Similarity Test to Cancel OFLOMAC Mark.

15 Feb 2023

The dispute concerned pharmaceutical trademarks OFLOMAC and OFRAMAX. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, the petitioner, challenged an order of the Inte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ITM Mark Based on Honest and Concurrent User Defence. Defendant's prior and continuous use of identical mark since 1994 established honest and concurrent user under Section 12 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, defeating claim for injunction.

15 Sep 2014

The plaintiffs, ITM Trust and its trustees, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendant, Educate India Society, alle...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'SUPER MOR CHHAP' Held Deceptively Similar to 'MOR CHHAP'. Registration and Prior Use of 'MOR CHHAP' for Lime Plaster Entitled Plaintiff to Protection Under Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958.

30 Sep 2016

The plaintiff, Sunil Manikchand Kasliwal, filed a suit for trade mark infringement against the defendant, Rahul Uttam Suryavanshi, alleging that the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Cross-Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Set Aside Parts of Arbitral Award on Partnership Trademark Ownership. Clause 6 of 2003 Partnership Deed Excluded Trademarks, Goodwill, and Name from Partnership Assets, Vesting Them Exclusively in Two Individuals.

6 May 2015

The Bombay High Court heard two cross-petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Patent Refusal for Lack of Reasoning on Inventive Step. The Court held that the Assistant Controller's order lacked any reasoning as to how the claimed invention was taught by prior art and failed to apply the five-step test for inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act, 1970.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Navya Network Inc., filed a petition under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970, challenging the order dated 27th May 2024 passed by ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds First Appellate Court's Declaration of Unlawful Possession and Order for Vacant Possession. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove tenancy rights and that the defendant's title by sale deed from mortgagee was valid, rejecting the plaintiff's claim of adverse possession.

5 Mar 2024

The case involves a property dispute over City Survey No. 2463 at Wai, Satara. The plaintiff, Ramesh Anandrao Shirke (since deceased, represented by l...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)