Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

917 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 917 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere law and order issues cannot justify preventive detention.

24 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Nikung Maheshbhai Sharma, through his father, challenged a preventive detention order dated 04.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Imminent Possibility of Release on Bail. Detaining Authority Failed to Disclose Cogent Material or Satisfaction That Detenu in Custody Would Be Released on Bail.

27 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Nitin Baban Pawar, challenged an order of detention dated 19th May 2022 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under the Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Material. Detenu's Dismissal from CISF for Alleged Smuggling Involvement Not Considered, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Ram Avatar Meena, father-in-law of the detenu Muralilal Meena, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 August 2013 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Material Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the detenue's bail status and the lack of independent material vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act, 1981.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Narasu Patil, a detenue, challenged an order of detention dated 12th October 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Than...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Quashed as Mechanical Exercise of Power Without Application of Mind.

3 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Sakir @ Bono Rustambhai Shekh, through his mother Habibabanu Rustambhai Shekh, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Failure to Consider Less Drastic Remedies. Detenu's bail in all three predicate offences and lack of credible material to show disturbance of public order vitiated the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority.

9 Apr 2020

The petitioner, Mukesh @ Mukya Ramesh Desaikar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 31st October 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and In-camera Statements Not Verified. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the detenu's bail status and to verify in-camera statements vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3 of the MPDA Act.

17 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Pravin @ Bhayya Pratap Shinde, challenged a preventive detention order dated 06/09/2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and the delay in passing the order vitiated the subjective satisfaction.

23 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Samad Salim Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 3(2) of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Alleged Smuggling of Red Sanders. Questions Raised Over Violation of Right to Equal Representation and Proper Subjective Satisfaction.

24 Aug 2012

The petition was filed by the wife of the detenu Ajit Bapu Satam, challenging his preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

2 Feb 2005

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)