Search Results for "Prakash Gupta"

772 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 772 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Illegal Handcuffing and Parading in a Bailable Offence. The Court Deliberates on Police Conduct and Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 in Context of Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, a law student, faced five criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, arising from dishonoured cheq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MCOCA Prosecution for Invalid Sanction — Lack of Application of Mind by Sanctioning Authority. Sanction under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 must reflect due consideration of material; mechanical grant vitiates prosecution.

The Bombay High Court disposed of four criminal writ petitions filed by Pradip Madgaonkar @ Bandya Mama, Vinod G. Asrani, and Jayant Rajaram Mule, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Amalgamation Scheme Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 — No Objections Raised by Regional Director or Official Liquidator. Court Held Scheme Fair and Reasonable and Not Contrary to Public Interest.

The Bombay High Court, exercising its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, considered two company petitions filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeals by Landowners Challenging Slum Dwellers' Protection Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Competent Authority's Classification of Structures as Slums and Occupants' Eligibility Upheld, Affirming Tribunal's Orders.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard nine Letters Patent Appeals (LPA Nos. 107 to 116 of 1996) involving common questions of law and fact. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Discretion to Not Provide Reservation in Promotions Without Collecting Quantifiable Data. Collection of Data Required Only When State Decides to Provide Reservation, Not When It Decides Against It.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from judgments of the Uttarakhand High Court concerning reservation in promotions for Schedule...