Search Results for "Partnership Asset"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Partnership Asset"

252 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Defendants’ Interim Applications for Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Suit on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Section 12-A Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Bar Under SARFAESI Act. Applications Filed by Financial Institution Defendants Against Real Estate Borrower Group.

4 Apr 2026

The dispute arises from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiffs against three defendants, seeking specific performance of a Framework Agreement date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Amalgamation Scheme of PMC Bank Under Section 45 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Fundamental Rights or Procedural Irregularities; Scheme Upheld as Serving Public Interest and Depositor Protection.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment deals with seven writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 25 January 2022 issued by the Ministr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Writ Petition and Grants Interim Stay on Recovery of Unearned Income. Demand of Rs.26.06 Crores Against Tata Communications Alleged to be Based on Erroneous Finding of Land Transfer Due to Change in Shareholding.

1 Dec 2025

The writ petition was filed by Tata Communications Limited (formerly Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited) challenging the order of the Revenue Minister dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Full and True Disclosure Finding and Non-Disposal of Objections. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Alleged Under Section 147 First Proviso of Income Tax Act, 1961.

27 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Crystal Pride Developers, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed its original return of income for Assessment Ye...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes LAO's Apportionment Order in Highway Acquisition — Directs Reference to Civil Court Under Section 19C(4) of Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Dispute over compensation apportionment between partnership firm and its individual partners requires adjudication by civil court, not LAO.

18 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Pravin Girish Chamaria and Nishit Bechar Patel, along with respondents 4 and 5 (Dilip Prabhakar Kudalkar and Jagdish Shashikumar Raje...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. in Insolvency Case — Holds That Statutory Charge Under Electricity Supply Agreement Survives Liquidation and Must Be Respected Under IBC. The Court ruled that a charge created under Section 53 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with contractual terms is not extinguished by the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the liquidator must treat the appellant as a secured creditor.

1 Jan 2023

The appellant, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (PVVNL), a state electricity distribution company, entered into an electricity supply agreement ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Mutuality for Incorporated Clubs — Supply of Food and Drinks to Members Not Taxable as Sale. The Court held that Article 366(29-A)(e) does not override the mutuality principle and that incorporated clubs acting as agents of their members do not effect a 'sale' under sales tax laws.

3 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court in this batch of appeals considered the applicability of the doctrine of mutuality to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment to...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.

5 Feb 2016

Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Taxability of Sale Proceeds of Self-Generated Trade Mark and Brand Name. The Court held that the receipt of consideration for trade mark and design was not taxable as capital gains in the absence of a specific provision for cost of acquisition of self-generated assets prior to the amendment to Section 55(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 effective from 1/4/2002.

12 Jun 2012

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Retiring Partners Held Capital Expenditure. Amount of Rs.1,34,678 paid to retiring partners under Memorandum of Understanding is capital expenditure not deductible as revenue expenditure.

30 Aug 2005

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee, Mandovi Hotel Pvt....

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)