Search Results for "Osmanabad"

543 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 543 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony and Lack of Homicidal Death Proof. Acquittal of Son, Wife, and Relatives for Murder of Deceased Trimbak Rasal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment dated 21.7.2001 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad in Sessions Case N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Revisional Order in Tenancy Dispute Over Inam Lands. Delay and Lack of Substantial Grounds Justified Dismissal of Revision Application Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act.

The petitioner, Nivratti Namdeo alias Laman Rathod, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3.5.1991 passed by the Additional Commissioner, A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Alleged Caste-Based Insults Occurred Inside Police Station, Not in Public View, Hence Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Not Attracted.

The applicants, thirteen individuals, filed a Criminal Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Bombay High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Money-Lending Case Due to Inordinate Delay of 33 Years. FIR under Section 39 of Maharashtra Money-Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 Quashed as Abuse of Process Where Transaction Occurred in 1982 and Civil Suit Pending.

The petitioner, an 85-year-old woman, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No.21/2015 registered against her under Section 39 of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 229(A) IPC for Theft of Electricity Due to Lack of Sanction. Prosecution Failed to Obtain Mandatory Consent Under Section 50 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 Before Framing Additional Charge.

The applicants, Uddhavrao Nivrutti Sarkale, Markand Uddhavrao Sarkale, and Sau. Anandibai Uddhavrao Sarkale, were accused in RCC No.381/2001 pending b...