Search Results for "Order XXXVII"

165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Impleadment of Liquidator in Pending Salary Recovery Suit -- Interprets IBC Provisions on Continuation of Proceedings Post-Liquidation -- Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Chamber Summons

The Petitioner, a former employee of Respondent No.1 company, had filed a Summary Suit in 2017 for recovery of salary dues -- After the company went i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Tribunal Order Refusing to Treat Company's Closure Application as Withdrawn. Held that the Tribunal's refusal was not perverse and the Union's application was premature under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the General Motors Employees Union challenging an order of the Industrial Tribunal dated 28.04.2023 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan — Defendant Raises Triable Issue Regarding Nature of Transaction as Payment for Machinery, Not Loan.

The plaintiff, Anjali Sales Corporation, filed a Summary Suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking a decree fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Order 6 Rule 2(3) CPC does not require dates and sums in figures and words in plaint, and Order 37 Rule 2 CPC does not mandate separate verification.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants (original defendants) against the order dated 07/11/2022 passed by the 14th Joint C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Deposited Amount in Summary Suit for Recovery of Debt. Plaintiff entitled to withdraw amount deposited by defendant as condition for leave to defend, subject to furnishing security.

The plaintiff, SKF India Ltd., filed a summary suit against the defendant, Banarasi Lal Madan, for recovery of Rs. 1,28,80,060.87 based on invoices, a...