Search Results for "Oral partition"

1076 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1076 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Partition Suit. Court Holds That Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC When Averments Disclose a Cause of Action, Even If Ancestral Character of Property Is Disputed.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Mohan Hirachand Shah (defendant no.1) against an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Confirms Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. Preliminary decree for partition of 40 cents on eastern side upheld as plaintiff proved prior possession and joint ownership of well.

The second appeal was filed by the defendants against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and first appellate court in a suit for declaration ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds trial and appellate court decrees granting 1/3rd share to plaintiffs in joint family property, rejecting defendants' claim of prior partition.

The present regular second appeal was filed by defendants No.1 to 6 (appellants) under Order XLII Rule 1 read with Section 100 of the Code of Civil Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Daughter's Right to 1/6th Share in Self-Acquired Property. The court held that the suit properties were self-acquired by the mother and not ancestral, and that daughters are entitled to equal share under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by Defendant Nos. 1 and 5, father and son, against the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2015 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Retrospective Application of Amendment Deleting Section 23 of Hindu Succession Act. Female Heirs Entitled to Partition of Dwelling House as Amendment Removes Disability and Applies to Pending Appeals.

The case involves a partition suit filed by Respondent No.1 (original plaintiff) against her brothers, including the Appellant (original defendant No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Ownership Dispute, Confirms Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Possession of Agricultural Land Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant No.1, Babasaheb s/o Raosaheb Malba (Kadam), against the judgment and order of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Double Acquisition of Land in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed as Land Already Acquired Once and Partitioned Thereafter. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4(1) — Double acquisition of same land not permissible.

The petitioners, Devram Govind Gadge and Vitthal Govind Gadge, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by the Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings on Oral Partition. Court holds that finding of oral partition in 1958 was perverse and that the Appellate Court erred in assuming that the eldest son acted as Karta during father's lifetime.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Shankar Ganpati Jagta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings on Oral Partition. Court holds that finding of oral partition in 1958 was perverse and that the Appellate Court erred in assuming that the deceased father acted as Karta of joint family.

This is a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Shankar Ganpati Jagtap, challen...