Search Results for "Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act"

134 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 134 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act, Condoning 258-Day Delay. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Partnership Disputes Arising from Deed of Alteration of Partnership Dated 10 April 2013.

7 Apr 2026

The applicant, Infra Poonam Developers LLP, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Order for Enquiry Under Section 59(b) of MLRC. Sale of Watan Land After Re-grant on Old Tenure Requires Enquiry Regarding Permission Under Circular Dated 13 November 1979.

10 Dec 2025

The case involves a challenge by the petitioners, Vishwanath Sahadu Wakhare and others, against an order dated 11 December 2020 passed by the Hon'ble ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications and Award for Highway Project Due to Incorrect Land Descriptions. Petitioners' lands were wrongly described in Section 3A and 3D notifications under the National Highways Act, 1956, leading to denial of opportunity to object and violation of principles of natural justice.

3 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Govind Poslya Gavit and Vilas Vijaysing Valvi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the land acquisition pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Actor and Bodyguard in Criminal Intimidation Case — Allegations of Abusive Language and Vague Threats Do Not Attract Sections 504 and 506 IPC. The court held that the essential ingredients of criminal intimidation and intentional insult were not made out, and continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

30 Mar 2023

The judgment concerns two applications filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) by Salman Khan (a well-known film actor) an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Permitting Composite Tenders for Civil and Electrical Works in Contractual Matters. The Court held that the decision in Aurangabad Electrical Contractors Association v. State of Maharashtra was incorrect as it interfered with policy decisions without showing arbitrariness or mala fides.

5 Sep 2019

The case arose from a reference by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court questioning the correctness of an earlier decision in Writ Petition No. 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SRA Scheme for Lack of Public Interest. Court finds that the petition is not a genuine public interest litigation but is filed to further personal interests of the petitioner.

9 Aug 2016

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Mumbai Division of Maharashtra Machhimar Kruti Samiti, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Police Order Restricting Entry to Educational Society Premises Under Section 39(1) of Bombay Police Act — Order Held Disproportionate and Without Proper Application of Mind. The court held that a preventive order under Section 39(1) must be based on material showing imminent danger of breach of peace and cannot be used to decide civil disputes over management of a society.

26 Jul 2013

The petitioners, Anandraj Y. Ambedkar and others, challenged an order dated 6 July 2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 39...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

19 Dec 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to 50% Women Reservation in BMC Elections — Amendment to Section 5A of BMC Act Upheld as Valid Policy Decision. Reservation for Women in Local Bodies Permissible Under Article 243T and Not Violative of Basic Structure.

30 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Kapoorchand Durgaprasad Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the amendment to Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

27 Oct 2010

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)