Search Results for "Maharashtra Airport Development Corporation"

175 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 175 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Land Allotment Under Displaced Persons Act Due to Laches. Court Holds That Displaced Persons Act, 1954 Does Not Envisage Issuance of Orders by Custodian for Execution of Compensation Claims.

The petitioner, Chandru Mirchandani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Termination of Lease and Eviction Orders in MIDC Land Dispute. Lease Termination Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Comply with Conditions and Was Not Entitled to Protection Under Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955.

The petitioner, M/s. Sesa Sterlite Ltd., a Public Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in Air India Ltd. — Probationers Have No Right to Be Confirmed and Termination Without Stigma Is Valid.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Jeetendra Krishna Varma (WP 875/2011) and Mayank Mohan Sharma (WP 1427/2015) against Air India Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Street Scheme Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1969 and Completed in 1986 Cannot Be Challenged After 14 Years Without Justification.

The dispute relates to the acquisition of land bearing field Survey Nos.147/2, 153, 154/1, 2 and 3, 155, 156 and 156/1, admeasuring about 10.10 acres,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute for Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain suit challenging acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as remedy lies before Reference Court under Section 18.

The appellants, owners of a property in Agonda, Goa, filed a suit seeking withdrawal from acquisition of their plots and compensation of Rs. 1,20,00,0...