Search Results for "MHADA Act"

310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of C-1 Building Despite IBC Moratorium — Development Rights Not Asset of Corporate Debtor. Cooperative Housing Society's Right to Redevelop Its Property Upheld Against Resolution Professional's Interference.

The Petitioner, Kher Nagar Sukhsadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned a building on land leased from MHADA. In 2005, it entered into a Develop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Remand Authority in Mumbai Slum Redevelopment Dispute. Key Decision on Appellate Powers and Arbitral Award Validity in Complex Multi-Party Case

The Supreme Court is addressing appeals concerning a High Court judgment on a slum redevelopment project in Mumbai. The case involves various parties,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Challenge to Cancellation of NOC for Redevelopment Due to Misrepresentation of Tenant Status. Landlord's Failure to Disclose Correct Residential Status of Tenants Renders Permission Void Ab Initio Under DCR 33(7) and MHADA Act.

The petitioners, Dahyabhai Papers & Boards Pvt. Ltd. and another, owned a dilapidated cessed building in Mumbai. They applied for redevelopment under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Plaintiffs in Tenancy Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Tenancy Rights. Court holds that mere possession or payment of rent does not establish tenancy without proof of lawful transfer or succession under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a dispute over a room (suit premises) allotted in lieu of an earlier tenanted room in a chawl at Mahim, Mumbai. The plaintiffs, Sulo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeals in MHADA Eviction Case — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Appellant's claim for tenancy rights rejected as he failed to prove lawful possession under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from eviction proceedings under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976. The appel...