Search Results for "Liability Ascertainment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Liability Ascertainment"

171 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Provisional Attachment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Attachment of Bank Accounts and Property Without Prior Hearing Held Invalid Under Section 79(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017.

26 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Navin Vishwanathan, proprietor of M/s. Oriental Facility, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 300A of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Receiver in Family Property Dispute. Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case for Receiver When Property is in Possession of Defendants and Alternative Remedy of Partition is Available.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiff, Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar, filed a suit for partition and accounts against his family members, including his mother, brothers, sisters...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Bonus Award by Limiting Depreciation Deduction in Surplus Calculation. Depreciation Admissible Under Income-tax Act Cannot Be Fully Claimed as Prior Charge; Abnormal Additions Like Initial and Additional Depreciation Not Fair to Workmen.

5 Nov 1957

The case arose from an industrial dispute between Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. and their workmen concerning payment of bonus for the year 1950–51. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Original Side Suit to High Court for Fresh Adjudication Due to Lack of Reasoned Judgment. Lack of Reasons by Trial and Appellate Courts Violated Principles of Judicial Procedure Under Order XLIX Rule 3(5) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, and Necessitated Setting Aside of Decrees.

12 Mar 1969

The dispute arose after the death of the appellant's husband, an attorney-at-law. The first respondent filed a suit on the original side of the Calcut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Apr 2014

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

9 Jul 2026

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Duty Case Due to Statutory Interpretation. Levy Under Bihar Electricity Duty Act 1948 Not Applicable as Supply Was to Licensee, Not Consumer as Defined Under Sections 2(b) and 2(ee).

24 Sep 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Patna High Court dated 18 September 2017, which declined to entertain a writ petition filed by the appellant, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

9 Dec 2019

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Is Mandatory and Unjust Enrichment Applies to Pre-deposit Refunds. The court held that the one-year limitation for refund claims cannot be extended and the claimant must prove no passing of duty burden.

8 Mar 2024

The case involves two connected matters: an appeal by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane Rural, against an order of the Customs, Excise ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal by Charitable Society Regarding Leave to Institute Suit Under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Dispute Involves Whether a Society Registered Under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 Can Be Treated as a Trust and Sought Determination of the Conditions for Granting Leave Following Allegations of Financial Mismanagement and Breach of Trust.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a suit instituted under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by two plaintiffs, Dr. Shelly Batra and Mrs. Usha Gupta...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)