Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act"

258 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows MRF Ltd. Appeal on Fringe Benefit Tax for Medical Reimbursement. Medical Reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per Employee per Annum Not Chargeable to Fringe Benefit Tax Under Section 115WB(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

6 Apr 2026

The appellant, MRF Ltd., a company manufacturing automobile tyres and rubber products, filed Tax Case Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Capital Gains vs Business Profits Dispute. Profit on Sale of Land Held as Capital Gains Where Assessee Not in Property Development Business.

9 Jan 2026

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for assessment year 2004-05. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Income Tax Appeal Filed by Assessee Company Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court’s Judgment Reserved on 12 June 2025 and Pronounced on 20 June 2025.

20 Jun 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Rule 6(4)(m)(i) of Karnataka Sales Tax Rules — Condition of 'Same Form' for Deduction in Works Contracts Not Ultra Vires Section 5B of KST Act. Rule 6(4)(m)(i) read with Explanation III is a deduction provision and does not expand the charging section; it is constitutionally valid.

2 Jul 2019

The appellant, M/s Craft Interiors (P) Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in interior decoration. It purchased goods like timber, plaster of p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Clarification on Tax Rate for Blood Bank Equipments Under KVAT Act, 2003 — Goods Held to Fall Under Entry 61 of Third Schedule as Medical Equipment. The court quashed the Commissioner's clarification that Blood Collection Monitors, Blood Storage Refrigerators, Deep Freezers, Platelet Agitators with Incubators, Plasma Expressers, and Cryobaths are not medical equipment under Entry 61 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

11 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Aditya Surgical Co., a dealer in blood bank equipments and other medical equipments, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Regional Rural Bank Entitled to Deduction Under Section 36(1)(viia) on Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debts. The court held that the provision for bad and doubtful debts made by the assessee-bank in accordance with RBI guidelines is allowable as a deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and that the Assessing Officer cannot recompute the provision based on a different percentage.

14 Dec 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 28.11.2013 passed ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not a Vegetable Product. Classification under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 depends on predominant ingredient and common parlance, not processing method.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Notional Loss Claim on Securities Reclassification. Tribunal's order allowing deduction of notional loss on transfer of securities from 'Available for Sale' to 'Held to Maturity' based on RBI guidelines upheld.

10 Jul 2014

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax-2 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 15 July 2011. The I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in International Taxation Case on Accrual of Interest and Tax Treaty Interpretation. Interest on Government Securities Held by Cyprus-Based Bank Does Not Accrue on Last Day of Financial Year When Not Due; Sale of Securities Constitutes Business Profits Under Article 14 of India-Cyprus DTAA.

9 Jul 2012

The case involves an appeal by the Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which ...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)