Search Results for "Karnataka Legislative Council"

278 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 278 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to Stone Crushers Act Reducing Distance from Dams. Court Holds Amendment Within Legislative Competence and Not Violative of Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, R. Anjaneya Reddy, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Karnatak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Work Order in Public Tender Dispute Due to Arbitrary Evaluation and Non-Compliance with Tender Conditions. Court holds that the respondent authority's failure to adhere to the stipulated tender conditions and its arbitrary evaluation of bids vitiates the award of the work order.

The petitioner, M/s. Hitech Audio Systems Pvt. Ltd., challenged a work order issued by the 2nd respondent, the Chief Engineer (Electrical) of the Publ...