High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "KIADB Act"
221 result(s) found
Found 221 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Interim Application in Land Acquisition Case Under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Acquisition proceedings for Peripheral Ring Road lapsed as compensation was not paid nor possession taken before commencement of the 2013 Act under Section 24(2), rendering interim relief infructuous.
20 Jan 2022The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR) around Bangalore, initiated by the Bangalore Development Author...
- 268
High Court
High Court Examines Whether Minister Can Drop Land Acquisition After Award and Dismissal of Landowner’s Challenge. Matter Concerns Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Power of Acquiring Authority to Object.
6 Oct 2017The petitioner, City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), acting as the New Town's Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...
- 42
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
24 Apr 2020Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...
- 31
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Acquired Land Due to Alternative Remedy of Civil Suit. Disputed questions of fact regarding impersonation and fraud in drawal of compensation under Section 29(3) of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 cannot be adjudicated in writ proceedings.
5 Feb 2014The petitioner, Mrs. Mary John, claimed ownership of 4 acres of land in Sy.No.74/302 of Bandi Kodigenahalli Village, which was acquired under the Karn...
- 61
High Court
Karnataka High Court Permits Landowners to Alienate Property Notified for Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act Due to Medical Emergency. Right to Life Under Article 21 of Constitution Overrides Procedural Restrictions When Property is Sole Source of Livelihood.
27 Mar 2023The petitioners, owners of land in Sy.No.207, Hulikunte Village, Doddaballapura Taluk, filed a writ petition seeking release of at least 50% ad interi...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act
27 Apr 2018The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...
- 38
High Court
- 16
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Denying Enhanced Compensation. Landowners' Claim for Higher Compensation Under Section 28 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 Rejected as Reference Court's Award Was Not Challenged.
29 Apr 2016The appellants, landowners whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under the Karnataka Industrial Areas ...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 64
