Search Results for "Judicial Autonomy"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award Setting Aside Penalties, Termination, and Blacklisting in Sewerage Treatment Plant Contract Dispute

The High Court of Bombay heard cross-petitions challenging an arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 in a dispute between Solapur Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Arbitral Awards for Lack of Valid Arbitration Agreement in Service Dispute. Fraudulent Claims Based on Non-Existent Agreement Cannot Be Enforced; Awards Declared Null and Void.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Uttar Pradesh against an order of the Allahabad High Court dismissing their intra-court appeal against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards for Lack of Concluded Contract. Joint Exploration Agreement Held Not Binding as Conditions Precedent Not Fulfilled, Resulting in No Valid Arbitration Agreement.

The case involves appeals by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (appellants) against M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (respondent)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Women's Entry into Haji Ali Dargah Sanctum Sanctorum — Gender Discrimination by Trust Struck Down. The Court held that the ban on women's entry violated constitutional guarantees of equality and freedom of religion, and directed the Trust to permit women access.

The petitioners, Dr. Noorjehan Safia Niaz and Zakia Soman, social activists and office bearers of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan, filed a Public Inte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...