KAHC010159832015_1
15 Dec 2017...
Search Results for "Indian Evidence Act"
12791 result(s) found
Found 12791 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Muslim Divorced Woman in Maintenance Case — Family Court Has Jurisdiction Under Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. High Court erred in holding that Family Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain application under Section 3 of the Act.
18 Jun 2020The appeal arose from a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which set aside an order of the Family Court granting maintenance to a Muslim divorced wo...
- 481
High Court
Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.
7 Oct 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Quashing of FIR in EPF Dues Under-Assessment Case — Court Examines Scope of Power Under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC, Citing R.P. Kapur and Bhajan Lal Precedents
2 May 2012The petitioner, a Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, had passed an assessment order under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscella...
- 40
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Internal Reservation for Backward Classes in Tamil Nadu - The Court reversed the High Court's declaration of unconstitutionality, holding that sub-classification within Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities is permissible under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution of India, 1950, based on commission recommendations and historical data.
31 Mar 2022The dispute arose from the Tamil Nadu Special Reservation of seats in Educational Institutions including Private Educational Institutions and of appoi...
- 929
High Court
Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Challenge to DRI's Investigation and Letters Rogatory in Coal Import Over-Valuation Case. Petitioner Argues Non-Cognizable Offences Require Magistrate Order under CrPC, Rendering Letters Rogatory Invalid.
17 Oct 2019The present writ petition before the Bombay High Court arises from an investigation initiated by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) against...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction Over Originating Summons in Lease Dispute Where Defendant Has Filed Separate Eviction Suit. The Court Examines Whether the Filing of a Suit Under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, After the Originating Summons Ousts the High Court's Jurisdiction.
29 Apr 2014This case involved a dispute between Century Textiles and Industries Ltd. (plaintiff) and Nusli Neville Wadia (defendant) arising out of a 999-year le...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Between Two Government Companies. Key Issue Involves Scope of Act and Validity of Second Eviction Notice Based on Security Ground Not Mentioned in Original Termination Notice.
17 Dec 2012The petitioner, Indian Petro Chemicals Corporation Limited, a Government company, occupied premises on the 9th and 19th floors of Air India Building, ...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners Under Right to Information Act, 2005 — Petitioner Alleges Vague Criteria and Lack of Judicial Expertise Violate Fundamental Rights. The Court Examines Whether Sections 12(5) and 15(5) Are Unconstitutional for Not Requiring Judicial Qualifications in Light of the Right to Information and Quasi-Judicial Functions.
1 Aug 2026The petitioner, a public-spirited citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution directly before the Supreme Court, challenging t...
- 65
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Family Court Judgment Declaring Respondent Sole Owner of Juhu Flat After Original Appellant's Death Renders Judicial Separation and Divorce Claims Not Pressed. Court Considers Whether 50% Share Claim Can Be Based on Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and Limitation Act, 1963 Despite Not Being Pleaded.
1 Apr 2024Background: The appeal arose from matrimonial proceedings between Rajeshri V. Mahesh (the original appellant) and Mahesh Vennalakanti (the respondent)...
