Search Results for "IPC Section 363"

393 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 393 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR Led to Benefit of Doubt for Accused Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and SC/ST Act.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship. Victim's Age Not Proved Below 18, and Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Yadav Chandoba Dawlekar, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.19 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 354, 363, 342 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

The appellant, Satish s/o Bandu Ragde, was convicted by the Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Special Child Protection Case No. 28 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 354-A IPC, Section 363/511 IPC, and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 26 January 2016, when the informant, a 16-year-old girl, along with her cousin sister, was walking to school for R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363 and 365 IPC set aside as sole identification by witnesses was doubtful and no independent corroboration of recovery of child.

The appellant, Aditya Sham Chaturvedi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, under Sections 363 and 365 read with Section 34 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 363, 376, 506, 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Age of Victim and Relied on Unreliable Sole Testimony.

The case involves an appeal against conviction for offences under Sections 363, 376, 506 and 342 IPC. The appellant, Dada Laxman Gaikwad, was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State and Complainant Appeals Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused Acquitted of Charges Under Sections 363, 302, and 201 IPC as Prosecution Failed to Prove Last Seen Theory and Motive.

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of a 7-year-old boy, the son of the complainant (PW.2). The accused, S.B. Mahadevakumar, was charged un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping Case Due to Prosecutrix Being a Willing Companion Above 16 Years. Consent and Age of Prosecutrix Established Through Evidence, Leading to Acquittal Under Section 363 IPC.

The appellant, Bharat Bageshwar, was convicted by the Sessions Court for kidnapping a minor girl under Section 363 IPC and sentenced to one year rigor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju S/o Bhimrao Girnare, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana, for offences punishable under Sections...