Search Results for "Fiduciary Capacity"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Information Commission Order in RTI Case — Petitioner Not a Third Party Under Section 11 of RTI Act. Personal Information of Public Servant Sought Cannot Be Denied Under Section 8(1)(j) Without Showing Larger Public Interest.

The petitioner, Smt. S. Savithramma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Dismissal of Bank Manager in Disciplinary Proceeding — Penalty Disproportionate to Misconduct Where No Loss Caused to Bank. Employer Must Consider Nature and Gravity of Charges and Unblemished Service Record Before Imposing Major Penalty.

The petitioner, Kishor Gopichand Ukey, was a Manager with the Central Bank of India. He was served with a charge-sheet containing eight charges in a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Information Commission Order Directing Disclosure of Notices Issued to Judges Under RTI Act — Notices Held to Be 'Personal Information' Exempt Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005

The High Court of Karnataka allowed two writ petitions filed by the State Public Information Officer and Deputy Registrar (Establishment) of the High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Dispute over loan repayment and property transfer held to be predominantly civil, not criminal, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicants, Santosh Adinath Ghalage and Vidya Santosh Ghalage, were accused in Crime No.14 of 2017 registered at Ajintha Police Station, Aurangaba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 7 Application for CIRP — Claimants Failed to Prove Debt and Default. The Tribunal held that the Appellants did not establish the existence of a financial debt or default, and the application was barred by limitation.

The present appeal was filed by Vistra ITCL (India) Limited, Pratiti Trading Private Limited, and Gajendra Investment Limited (Appellants) against the...