Search Results for "Extended limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Extended limitation"

1841 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1841 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Cantonment Board's Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute. Limitation period for Section 11 application under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from date of refusal to appoint arbitrator, not from request date, under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and no claim certificate does not extinguish arbitration clause.

15 Mar 2021

The dispute arose from three contracts dated 23.09.2000 and 17.09.2001 between Secunderabad Cantonment Board (appellant) and M/s B. Ramachandraiah & S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application by Municipal Corporation Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 235 Days in Filing Appeal Not Explained with Affidavit or Proper Grounds, Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5.

17 Jan 2006

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai filed an application for condonation of delay of 235 days in filing a first appeal against a decision of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Franchise Dispute Due to Ex-Facie Time-Barred Claims. Limitation Act, 1963 applies to Section 11(6) applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the court may refuse reference where claims are hopelessly barred by limitation.

1 Mar 2024

The petitioner, M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd., a company based in Afghanistan, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Condonation of Delay in Section 140 Motor Accident Claim — No Limitation Prescribed for No-Fault Compensation. Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Application for Condonation of Delay as Section 140 Does Not Prescribe Any Limitation Period.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Ramesh Bhimrao Patil, was injured in a motor accident that occurred on 24 November 1989. He filed an application under Section 166 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition as Time-Barred, Confirms Arbitral Award. Limitation for Filing Section 34 Petition Runs from Date of Receipt of Award, Not from Date of Filing of Wrong Remedy.

4 May 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bomb...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Order Allowing Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal — Limitation Act Section 5 Application Allowed on Costs. The court upheld the trial court's discretion to condone a delay of about 12 years in filing an appeal against a decree in a suit for permanent injunction, finding no jurisdictional error under Section 115 CPC.

5 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Mr. M Rathnavarma Padival, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an orde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Religious Endowments Case — Commissioner Not a Court, Section 5 Limitation Act Not Applicable. Delay Condonation by Commissioner Under Section 69 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Set Aside as Commissioner Lacks Power to Apply Section 5 of Limitation Act.

3 May 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the right to receive first respect as an Ambalam in a village in Tamil Nadu. The appellant, Ganesan, throug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, and no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the applications to set aside the awards.

27 Aug 2018

The case involves nine commercial appeals filed by various micro and small enterprises (appellants) against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.

26 Nov 2019

This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)