Search Results for "Export Promotion Scheme"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notice Against Director in Customs Duty Recovery Case – Recovery Provision Under Section 142 Cannot Be Invoked Against Non-Defaulter. Attachment of Director's Personal Property Set Aside as She Was Not Adjudged Liable Under Customs Act, 1962.

Suman N. Agarwal, a director of Nisum Global Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice of demand dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Delivers Judgment on Appeals Concerning Locus Standi of Third-Party Residents in Excise Licence Cases. Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition When Alternate Remedy Exists Under Bombay Prohibition (Closure of Licence) Order, 2003.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court in a writ petition filed by three local residents challenging the State G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Company Law Board's Power to Direct Issue of Shares Under Section 111 of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal raises the question whether the Board can order issuance of share certificates and rectification of register absent valid transfer documents.

This company appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 14 January 2013 in Company Petition No. 23 of 2012. The CLB had directed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cooperative Housing Dispute — Upholds Cooperative Court's Order for Transfer of Flat. Transfer of share and interest in a tenant co-partnership society requires compliance with by-laws and rules; society cannot refuse transfer without valid reason.

The Petitioner, Smt. Geeta Narayan Parvati, was a lecturer and member of Respondent No.2 Society, a tenant co-partnership society registered under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be Ignored by Revisional Authority.

The petitioners, residents of Village Chas (kaman), Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Disabled Employee Against Private Company for Violation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Employer Directed to Re-Employ or Pay Compensation for Hearing Loss Acquired Due to Unsafe Work Environment.

The petitioner, Shree Satish Prabhakar Padhye, a person with hearing disability, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...