Search Results for "Disclaimer"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Father's Appeal in Child Custody Dispute, Upholds Mother's Custody Based on Child's Welfare. The court held that the welfare of the child is paramount, and the mother's custody was in the child's best interest under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.

The case involves a custody dispute between the appellant father, Mr. Arun Sharma, a Hindu, and the respondent mother, Roxann Sharma, a Christian Amer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against YouTuber for Disparaging Marico's Products in Video Review. Court holds that false and malicious statements in product reviews can constitute disparagement, and interim injunction can be granted even if defendant is not a competitor.

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a company manufacturing and selling various consumer products including hair oils and foods, filed a suit against the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Star Zing Marks Protected. Use of identical marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' by Defendant restrained as deceptively similar to Plaintiff's registered trademarks.

The Plaintiff, Sky Enterprise Private Ltd., filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademarks and passing off by the Defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Rebate Claim as Time-Barred Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act — Export Date Determines Limitation Period, Filing of ARE-1 Not a Substitute for Rebate Claim.

The petitioner, Everest Flavours Ltd., exported a consignment of 360 drums containing Menthol Crystals to Bangkok on 12 February 2006. The shipping bi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Foreign Company Failed to Comply with Registration Requirements Under Sections 592 and 599 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner, a foreign company with a place of business in India, cannot maintain a winding-up petition without registering under the Act.

The petitioner, Willis Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its principal place of business in the United Kingdo...