Search Results for "Designate Judge"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Designate Judge"

300 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitrator's Interim Award Impleading Non-Signatory in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that an arbitral tribunal cannot implead parties who are not signatories to the arbitration agreement as it lacks inherent jurisdiction.

27 Mar 2024

The Petitioner, Cardinal Energy and Infra Structure Private Ltd., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Government of Israel in Commercial Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's Rejection of Set-Off and Counter-Claim as Time-Barred Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

6 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusive Power of Central Government to Appoint Arbitrator Under National Highways Act, 1956 — Section 11 of Arbitration Act, 1996 Not Maintainable. The Court held that the special enactment's inbuilt mechanism for arbitrator appointment prevails over the general arbitration law, and the High Court erred in appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6).

27 Aug 2019

The case involves a dispute between the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and Sayedabad Tea Company Ltd. regarding the acquisition of land f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application in International Commercial Arbitration — Holds Applicant Habitually Resident in UAE. Interpretation of 'habitually resident' under Section 2(1)(f)(i) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 determines that an Indian national residing in UAE for employment is habitually resident there, making the arbitration international commercial arbitration.

22 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns three arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in Work Order vesting jurisdiction in Delhi courts ousts jurisdiction of Karnataka High Court under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Polybond Organics Private Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Unsuccessful Plaintiff's Regular Second Appeal in Recovery Suit — Suit Barred by Limitation. The court upheld concurrent findings that the suit for recovery of money filed beyond the period of limitation under Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was not maintainable.

4 Jul 2016

The appellant, Sanna Mallappa, was the plaintiff in a suit for recovery of money filed against the respondent, R.P. Siddeshwarappa, in the Court of Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Development Dispute — Consent Terms Creating Arbitration Agreement Are Valid and Enforceable Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Appoints Substitute Arbitrator When Named Arbitrator Did Not Enter Upon Reference.

12 Jun 2015

The applicant, Mohan Balkrishna Lulla, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applicant's Claim for Compensation in Arbitration Proceedings Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Designate Judge under Section 11 cannot award compensation for alleged delay in arbitration; remedy lies elsewhere.

28 Jun 2013

The applicant, Shailesh H. Kulkarni, filed a Misc. Civil Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking directions...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitrator Appointment in BPCL Dispute — No Bias Found in Sole Arbitrator Being an Employee of the Respondent Company. The court held that mere employment does not create automatic disqualification under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and petitioners failed to show actual bias.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns five arbitration petitions filed by different companies (Faridabad Metal Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Hindustan Wires Limited Ltd., Universa...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)