Search Results for "Dangerous Person"

1056 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1056 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Petitioner Due to Lack of Public Order Threat and Improper Use of Antecedents -- Fundamental Rights Upheld in Preventive Detention Case

The petitioner challenged a detention order dated 13.10.2025 passed under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act, arguing it violated his fundamental rights und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider the material and the alleged activities did not affect public order.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar @ Chandya s/o Devrao Paikrao, challenged a detention order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Nanded u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows State's Appeal Against Quashing of Detention Order. High Court's Interpretation of Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 Regarding Detention Period is Erroneous.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against the High Court's order quashing a preventive detention order under the Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 326 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 4 April 2013 in village Nipani Jawalka, where the deceased Mahadeo was allegedly assaulted by the appellants. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders for Violation of Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. Non-supply of Bail Application and Bail Order in Connected Crime Renders Detention Invalid Despite Section 5A of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Sayed Jafar Sayed Nasir, challenged two detention orders dated 20th February 2018 and 12th March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Defective Translation of Grounds of Detention. Error in Translating CR Number in Marathi Version Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Sunil Bharat Govari, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance — Single Criminal Case and In-camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Detention as 'Dangerous Person'

The petitioner, Arjun Balkrishna Sonavane, challenged a preventive detention order dated 12.10.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Orders Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Petitioners' Custody Status and Relied on Unverified In-Camera Statements.

The petitioners, Pravin Nivrutti Pagare, Sunil Mahadeo Khandagale, and Vijay Premnath Gosavi, were detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prev...