Search Results for "Court fee valuation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Court fee valuation"

321 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State Bank of India in Jet Airways Insolvency Case — Holds Performance Bank Guarantee Cannot Be Adjusted Against Resolution Plan Payment and Non-Implementation Leads to Liquidation. The Court ruled that the SRA's failure to pay airport dues and employee dues constituted non-implementation of the Resolution Plan under Section 33(3) IBC, 2016, and the PBG cannot be set off against the first tranche payment.

13 Nov 2024

The case pertains to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways (India) Limited, initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand for Bank Guarantee in Customs Valuation Dispute — SVB Proceedings Must Be Concluded Before Demanding Differential Duty. The court held that the demand for bank guarantee for differential duty on imports from related parties before completion of Special Valuation Branch proceedings is arbitrary and unsustainable under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Circular No. 5/2016-Customs.

20 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Pernod Ricard India Private Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing, blending, and selling Indian made foreign liquor, filed a wri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act Maintainable on Limitation Issue Even When Valuation/Rate of Duty Not Disputed. The Court ruled that the question of limitation is a distinct legal issue not relating to assessment, valuation, or rate of duty, and thus appeals challenging only the time-bar aspect are maintainable before the High Court under Section 35G.

23 Dec 2021

The case arose from a Central Excise Appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Displaced Persons Property Dispute, Directs Payment of Modified Compensation. The Court set aside the Division Bench order and directed sale of property at a reduced amount considering the original price and increased land value.

12 Apr 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the transfer of property to a displaced person under the Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation) ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Final Decree Proceedings in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Discretion to Appoint Commissioner for Division of Property by Metes and Bounds Under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC. The court held that appointment of a Commissioner is a procedural step to assist the court in effecting partition and does not determine rights; parties can file objections to the Commissioner's report.

23 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Sri G. Sathyavelu, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the X...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order on Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Suit Valuation Determined by Relief Sought in Plaint. The court held that the trial court erred in relying on the defendant's valuation of the suit property to oust its pecuniary jurisdiction, as the valuation for jurisdiction must be based on the relief claimed in the plaint under Section 6 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

10 Sep 2014

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.124 of 2013 before the 4th Joint Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Akola, seeking a declaration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Court Fees Dispute for Injunction Suit. Suit for Simplicitor Injunction Falls Under Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court Fees Act, Not Section 6(iv)(d) for Possession.

13 Feb 2013

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Plaintiffs (Lalchand Kalro and others) against the Respondents (Neeraj Lalchand Kalro and others) chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Patent Suit to High Court Under Section 104 of Patents Act, 1970 — Counterclaim for Revocation Mandates Transfer. The court held that upon filing a counterclaim for revocation of a patent, the suit must be transferred to the High Court, and the trial court cannot insist on payment of court fees before taking the counterclaim on record.

6 Jun 2011

The applicant, SERGI Transformers Explosion Prevention Technologies Private Limited, challenged the orders of the learned District Judge, Thane dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Suit for Pecuniary Jurisdiction - Claims in Suit and Counterclaim Must Be Aggregated to Determine Court's Pecuniary Jurisdiction Under Section 6 of the Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869. The court held that the aggregate value of the suit claim and counterclaim determines the pecuniary jurisdiction, and since it exceeded the limit of the Junior Division, the suit must be transferred to the Senior Division.

15 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Dilip Khasbage, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15/2/2010 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Overrules Earlier View on Small Cause Court Jurisdiction — Holds That Investment Under Section 28 of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 Does Not Confer Unlimited Pecuniary Jurisdiction. The court ruled that the pecuniary ceiling under Section 26 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 applies to courts invested with small cause powers under Section 28 of the 1869 Act, overruling Salimkhan v. Mohammad Ibrahimkhan.

5 Oct 2010

The case arose from a reference by a learned Single Judge (Shri B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) who disagreed with an earlier decision in Salimkhan v. Mohamma...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)