Search Results for "Consumer Court"

1578 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1578 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Electricity Board's Appeals in Illegal Disconnection Case — Board Cannot Claim Charges for Period of Its Own Wrongful Act. Initial Disconnection Without Considering Consumer's Instalment Request Violates Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Bihar State Electricity Board (appellant) and M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (respondent/company) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSEDCL's Challenge to CGRF Order Setting Aside Retrospective Subsidy Recovery. Retrospective Recovery of VM Subsidy Without Prior Notice Held Unjust Under MERC Regulations.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the final order dated 15.01.2025 passed by the Consume...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Considers Second Appeals on Maintainability of Civil Suits Involving Electricity Tariff Dispute – Core Issue Is Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction Under Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003

The appellants, who were plaintiffs in the original suits, filed four separate suits (O.S. Nos. 613/2013, 612/2013, 610/2013, and 611/2013) before the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Farmers' Insurance Claim in Cold Storage Fire — Insurer Liable Despite No Privity of Contract. Farmers are Consumers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and Insurance Company Must Pay for Loss of Stored Agricultural Produce.

The case involves multiple appeals arising from a common order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission regarding a fire that occurred o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MSEDCL for Refund of Infrastructure Costs Under DDF Category. Consumer Definition Under Electricity Act, 2003 Includes Persons Supplied Electricity for Layout Development.

The petitioner, Smt. Savita Chandrashekhar Thodage, applied to the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) for a new electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Board Against Decree Declaring Demand Letter Illegal. Court Holds That Dispute Regarding Meter Accuracy Must Be Referred to Electrical Inspector Under Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, and Civil Suit Is Not Maintainable.

The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (Board) appealed against a decree passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan, which declared a demand ...