Search Results for "Confiscation Liability"

151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Central Excise Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sanction. Prosecution for Alleged Removal of Scrap Resistors Without Payment of Duty Fails as Complaint Filed After 4 Years and Sanction Under Section 9 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Not Obtained.

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of Criminal Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Redemption Fine as Business Expenditure. Redemption fine of Rs. 75,00,000 paid for unauthorized import of almonds held allowable as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which allowed the asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — CESTAT's Finding of Baseless Charges Upheld. Penalty Dropped as Evidence Lacked Direct Link to Respondent Under Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in VAT Evasion Case — IPC Offences Not Invokable When Special Statute Exists. FIR under IPC and MVAT Act quashed as investigation under MVAT Act must be by VAT authorities, not police, and IPC cannot be invoked for acts covered by special statute.

The petitioners, directors of G.S. Oils Ltd., challenged FIR No. 139/2012 registered at Police Station Wani for offences under Sections 406, 409, 420,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission's Majority Decision Rejecting Settlement Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Majority view prevails over minority view under Section 127I of the Customs Act, 1962 when there is a difference of opinion among Members.

The petitioners, Under Water Services Company Limited and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...