Search Results for "Common Purpose"

8331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Reversing NCDRC's Dismissal on Consumer Status. Overdraft Facility Availed by Stockbroker for Business Qualifies as Consumer Service Under Exception for Self-Employment Livelihood in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissing a consumer complaint on the ground that the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against Quashing of Acquisition of Part of Building Without Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court Held That Acquisition of a Portion of a Building Without Acquiring the Land Beneath It is Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court dated 10.3.2006 in two writ petitions filed by Reliance Industries Ltd. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Batch of Writ Appeals Filed Under Karnataka High Court Act Against Single Judge Order in BDA Matter. The Court’s decision and specific legal findings are not provided in the extracted text.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, constituted by Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda, heard a batch of writ appeals on 26th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...