SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009
8 Feb 2019The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...
Search Results for "Central Government Authority"
7083 result(s) found
Found 7083 result(s)
High Court
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Government Scheme for Verification of Membership of Officers for Appointment of Non-Workman Employee Director in Nationalised Banks. The Scheme dated 17.10.2000 is held intra vires the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous) Scheme, 1970 and 1980.
10 Aug 2010The Petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra Officers' Association, a trade union representing officers cadre employees of Bank of Maharashtra, filed a writ pe...
- 66
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Challenge to Royalty Rules Under MMDR Act. Petitioners Argue Notification and Amended Rule 64D Exceed Section 9(3) Powers.
8 May 2013These writ petitions arose out of challenges by various mining leaseholders in Goa to the notification dated 13 August 2009, the amendment to Rule 64D...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Amalgamation Scheme of PMC Bank Under Section 45 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Fundamental Rights or Procedural Irregularities; Scheme Upheld as Serving Public Interest and Depositor Protection.
9 Mar 2026The judgment deals with seven writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 25 January 2022 issued by the Ministr...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preemptive Purchase Orders Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Difference in Valuation Below 15% Threshold. The Appropriate Authority's orders under section 269UD(1) were set aside as the difference between fair market value and apparent consideration was less than 15%, and no opportunity of hearing was given.
23 Dec 2011The petitioners, Pandharinath Bhikaji Telge and Dattaram Bhikaji Telge, were owners of a property in Chembur, Mumbai. They entered into an agreement t...
- 141
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.
23 Dec 2014The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...
- 23
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Bank CEO Appointment Dispute — Upholds Apex Society's Power to Depute Cadre Officers. Section 54(3) of Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 obligates District Central Cooperative Bank to accept CEO deputed by State Cooperative Bank from its cadre.
4 Mar 2020The dispute arose from the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the first respondent, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, a District C...
- 211
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Workmen Director in Nationalised Bank. The court held that the Central Government's approval is mandatory for appointment of Workmen Director under Section 9(3)(c) of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, and the Bank cannot unilaterally accept nominations.
8 Apr 2011The petitioners, Federation of Bank of India Staff Unions and its Deputy General Secretary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...
- 176
