Search Results for "CPC applicability"

747 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 747 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Rejects Trial Court's Dismissal of Temporary Injunction. Agreement of Sale for Rs.10.75 Crore with Rs.5 Crore Advance — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favor of Plaintiff-Appellant.

The appellant, M/s. Sanjeevini Developers and others, filed a miscellaneous first appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Order Holding Suit for Modification of Trust Scheme Not Maintainable Before Persona Designata. The District Judge as Persona Designata Does Not Have Jurisdiction to Amend the Scheme Framed Under Section 92 CPC; Such Suits Must be Filed in Civil Court.

This writ petition arises from a challenge to the order dated 5 December 2024 passed by the President of Shree Dnyaneshwar Maharaj Sansthan, Alandi, P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant's Appeal Against Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. High Court's Liberal Approach to Allowing Amendment for Enhancing Damages After 31 Years Upheld, with Issue of Limitation Kept Open for Trial Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, where the appellant, Life Insurance Corporation of India,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Third Party Impleadment in Property Appeal — Applicants Claiming Adverse Possession Must Be Heard. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC invoked to join parties with independent title claims to ensure complete adjudication.

The present application was filed by two applicants, Khalil Haji Bholumiya Salar and Bilkis Mehboobsaheb Mujawar, seeking impleadment in First Appeal ...