Search Results for "CGST refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "CGST refund"

103 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Order Denying Tax Appropriation and Rectification of Returns. Court Quashes Impugned Order as Without Jurisdiction and Permits Rectification of GST Returns Since Tax Paid Exceeded Proposed Input Tax Credit Reversal with No Revenue Loss Under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

8 Jan 2026

The dispute involved writ petitions challenging GST authorities' orders denying appropriation of tax paid and refusing rectification of returns. The p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to SVLDRS Demand for Additional Payment of Rs.1,25,23,051/- Due to Incorrect Declaration and Shifting Stands on CENVAT Credit Utilisation Date. The court held that the petitioner's false declaration and inconsistent statements disentitled it from equitable relief under Article 226.

9 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Fork Media Pvt. Ltd., challenged the impugned order (SVLDRS FORM 3) dated 27 January 2022 requiring payment of an additional amount of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Dispute — Interest on Delayed Possession to Run from 1 July 2016, Not 1 January 2020, But COVID Period Excluded from Interest Liability. The court held that the promoter is liable to pay interest from the date of default as per the agreement, but the COVID-19 pandemic period is excluded from interest liability.

23 Jan 2024

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Pragatej Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. (the promoter) against a common judgment and order dated 7 Febr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Illegal Disposal of Seized Gold Jewellery Without Notice and Before Confiscation Order. Customs Authorities Directed to Pay Current Market Value for 1028 Grams of Gold Disposed in Violation of Section 111 of Customs Act, 1962 and Article 300A of Constitution.

21 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Leyla Mohmoodi and Mojtaba Ebrahim Gholami, through their constituted attorney, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in SVLDRS Scheme Case — Rejection of Form 1 Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Held Eligible for Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Despite Pending Audit.

13 Sep 2023

The petitioner, P. N. Gadgil & Sons Ltd., a manufacturer and seller of gold/silver articles and jewellery registered under the Central Excise Act, fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Section 11D Demand for Ethanol Blended Petrol. The court held that CESTAT erred in setting aside demand under Section 11D of Central Excise Act, 1944 merely because duty was not separately shown in invoice, as duty was collected as part of composite price.

18 Jul 2023

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur Commissionerate appealed against an order of CESTAT, Mumbai dated 31 August 2020, which allowed the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment Orders Quashed and Remanded for Fresh Hearing Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

4 May 2023

The petitioner, Siemens Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed multiple writ petitions challenging assessment orders pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revenue Tribunal's Order Automatically Vacating Stay in Land Dispute — Asian Resurfacing Principle Not Applicable to Revenue Tribunals Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The court held that the automatic vacation of interim stay after six months under Asian Resurfacing applies only to CPC and criminal proceedings, not to revenue tribunals under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

18 Apr 2022

The petitioner, Devsing Ramchandra Chavan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 23 June 2021 passed by the Ma...

8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)