High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation. Case Involves Actions of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Under B.M.C. Act, 1888.
17 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888"
400 result(s) found
Found 400 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.
16 Apr 2024The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MCGM for Lease Renewal and Conveyance of Leasehold Plot. Court holds that delay in registration of assignment deed does not invalidate assignment and that lessee is entitled to renewal and conveyance under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.
1 Mar 2024The petitioners, Kesar Corporation, Troika Constructions Company, and Dattashram Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition against the M...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Demolition Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' structure demolished without notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and court orders restoration.
8 Sep 2023The petitioners, occupiers of a plot of land in Jogeshwari, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 15 June 2023 passed by the Executive Engineer of the Bri...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice Against Tenants in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Notice Issued Without Hearing Tenants Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Section 264(1) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 Requires Notice to Occupants Before Demolition.
17 Mar 2023The petitioners, who are tenants of various shops in a building owned by the respondent no. 3 (since deceased), challenged a notice dated 05.03.2021 i...
- 20
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Tax Dispute — Water Benefit Tax Held Leviable Despite Disconnection of Water Supply. Premises Connected by Communication Pipes with Municipal Water Works Attract Property Tax Under Section 141 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Irrespective of Actual Water Consumption.
22 Oct 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which had qua...
- 322
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging MCGM Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act — Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar of Section 527 of MMC Act and Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 354A(3). The court held that the civil court's jurisdiction is barred when a statute provides a complete mechanism for redressal.
9 Oct 2013The appellant, M/s. Akash Impex, a registered partnership firm, acquired suit property Gala No.24/25, CTS No. 240-C at Khetani Industrial Estate, Kurl...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice in Slum Redevelopment Project. Corporation's Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Quashed for Non-Compliance with DCR 33(7) Prior Approval Requirement.
10 Jun 2013The petitioner, M/s Crescent Property Developers, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Ar...
- 134
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Entrustment of Playground Land to Samiti for Development and Maintenance. Municipal Corporation's Decision to Entrust Land on Caretaker Basis for Playground Construction Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 63 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
23 Feb 2006The appellants, Sarvajanik Shri Ganeshotsav Mandal and its president Sanjay Sawant, filed an appeal against the dismissal of their writ petition by a ...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...
- 157
