Search Results for "Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976"

308 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Validity of Acquisition for Bangalore Development Authority. Landowners' challenge to acquisition proceedings fails as court finds no violation of statutory provisions under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

5 Sep 2019

The appellants, Sri A. Chandrashekar and Smt Kempamma, filed a writ appeal against the State of Karnataka and others, challenging the acquisition of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Winding Up of Bangalore Development Authority for Non-Payment of Arbitral Award. Court holds that a statutory authority cannot be wound up under the Companies Act, 2013, and the remedy lies in execution of the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Sep 2019

The petitioner, IL&FS Engineering and Construction Company Ltd. (formerly Maytas Infra Ltd.), a company engaged in infrastructure construction, had an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation for Local Body Elections. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Seek to Quash State Notifications Alleging Arbitrary Reservation.

14 Jan 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a large batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The peti...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Issues Directions to BBMP to Demolish Illegal Construction by Adjoining Landowner for Gross Violation of Building Bye-Laws. BBMP Officials Found to Have Failed in Statutory Duty to Inspect and Enforce Commencement Certificate Requirement Under Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Byelaws 2003 and Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976.

19 Nov 2014

Background: The petition was filed by the owner of property No.8/2, adjacent to respondents 4 and 5's property No.8/1 in Bangalore. The petitioner all...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

29 Jan 2014

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims Cases — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Negligence. The court held that in the absence of evidence of income and negligence, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was excessive and required reduction.

13 Mar 2013

The case involves multiple appeals filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribuna...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)