Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1515 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1515 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Arbitrator's failure to consider vital evidence and crucial documents renders award patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Ci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Commercial Dispute. Petition Involves Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Allowing Rejection of Goods After Acceptance, Contrary to Section 42 of Sale of Goods Act.

24 Dec 2025

The petitioner, a manufacturing company, issued a purchase order to the respondent, a trading company, for the supply of stainless steel seamless tube...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in FPSO Charter Hire Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and rejection of counterclaims, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the award.

28 Apr 2015

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order Directing Undertaking Against Alienation of Property. Arbitration Petition Filed Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Order Under Section 17 in a Long-Pending Development Dispute.

25 Mar 2019

The Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed challenging the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Arbitral Award in Lease Dispute — Lessee's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the lease agreement and findings on breach of contract were plausible and not perverse, thus not warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Nov 2025

The appellant, Godolphine India Private Limited (formerly Darvesh Industries India Pvt Ltd), filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the A...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Interim Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Prima Facie Finds Interim Award Passed Without Considering Entire Pleadings and Grants Stay of Enforcement.

7 Aug 2019

The matter involved two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim award dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Price Escalation Dispute. Interpretation of price escalation clause by arbitral tribunal found patently illegal as it ignored the contractual formula, leading to setting aside of award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Aug 2022

The case involves a challenge under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against a judgment dated 31st March 2017 passed by a lear...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Refers Non-Signatory to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The Court held that the referral court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 must only examine the existence of an arbitration agreement on a prima facie basis, and the group of companies doctrine can bind a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement.

20 Sep 2024

The present petition was filed under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(9) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a Sole...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)