Search Results for "Arbitrability"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitrator Appointment in Tender Dispute Due to Absence of Concluded Contract. No Valid Arbitration Agreement Found as Letter of Intent Was Contingent on Formal Work Order Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), a state government electricity distribution utility, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied.

The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Extra Work Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Quantum and Interest Are Not Open to Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s. Shirdi Country Inns Pvt. Ltd., invited a tender for certain work through its consultant. The respondent, M/s. Suvidha Engineers In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's findings on fraud, jurisdiction, and liability, rejecting allegations of perversity and violation of natural justice.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Avitel Post Studioz Ltd. and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Interim Application in Share Dispute — Appointment of Arbitrator and Injunction Granted. Court holds that disputes regarding share transfer and oppression are arbitrable and appoints arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Kantilal Chhaganlal Securities Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...