Search Results for "writ of certiorari"

185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Could not generate case title

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Could not generate case title

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable for Dual Appointment and Forgery in Jharkhand Police Case. Division Bench Erred in Reappreciating Evidence in Departmental Enquiry Where Charges of Fraud and Unauthorised Absence Were Proved on Preponderance of Probabilities.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, which allowed the Letters Patent Appeal file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forest Land Dispute — Patta Claim Fails for Lack of Original Title Documents. Notification Under Repealed Act Not Invalid if Consistent with New Law; Revenue Entries Without Supporting Documents Lack Evidentiary Value.

The case involves a dispute over 600 acres of land in Survey No. 81, Kalvalanagaram Village, Khammam District (now in Telangana). The Appellants claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of ICAR Scientist Challenging Tenure Curtailment — No Enforceable Right to Complete Fixed Term When Appointment Expressly Reserved Power to Curtail. Reversion Based on Unsatisfactory Performance Not Stigmatic Under Service Law.

The appellant, joined ICAR as a Scientist in 1978 and later became Senior Scientist at CIAE, Bhopal. In 1998, he was appointed as ADG-ARIS for a perio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Appeals in GST Case Despite Limitation Bar — Deficiency Memo Not Issued. Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017 Mandates Issuance of Deficiency Memo and Opportunity of Hearing Before Rejecting Refund Application; Appellate Authority Must Consider Limitation Issue on Merits.

The petitioner, K Line India Pvt. Ltd., a company providing shipping services, filed refund applications for IGST paid on zero-rated supplies to SEZ u...