Search Results for "union victimisation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "union victimisation"

90 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Writ Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Industrial Court's Reversal of Labour Court's Finding of Victimization Set Aside. The Court held that the Industrial Court erred in reversing the Labour Court's order without properly considering evidence of victimization and biased enquiry under Item 1(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

15 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Shantaram Yashwant Mahale, a former employee of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), filed a writ petition challe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act Due to Misdirection in Law. Court Holds That No Victimization or Bad Faith Was Found, and Retrenchment Due to Surplus Employee Was Not Illegal Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.

13 Jul 2018

The dispute arose from the retrenchment of Thanpal Subhaiysh, a driver employed by M/s. Colliers International (India) Property Services Limited. He w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award Denying Reinstatement of Workman. Domestic Inquiry Held Fair and Punishment of Dismissal Upheld as Not Disproportionate Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

4 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra General Kamgar Union, a registered trade union, challenged the Award dated 8th April 1994 (Part-I) and Award dated 7th Apr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Industrial Dispute Case — Misconduct Proved but Punishment Disproportionate. Labour Court's Discretion Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Upheld as Not Perverse or Unreasonable.

29 Jul 2024

The petitioner-employer, a company manufacturing fuel injection equipment, challenged an Award dated 13 December 2023 of the First Labour Court, Nashi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Labour Court's Direction to Reinstate Workman with Full Wages Pending Complaint Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

27 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October 2005, which dismissed its revision...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Coercion. Employees' Allegations of Forced Resignation and Acceptance of Cheques Not Proven; Industrial Court's Finding of Voluntary Settlement Upheld.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, employees of Hotel King's Palace, filed a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Terminated on Loss of Confidence. Unfair Labour Practice Found Under Item 1(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Suresh Narbharam Kachalia, was a workman employed by M/s Shakti Insulated Wires Ltd. since 25 July 1963. After serving for nearly 23 y...

High Court

High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.

26 Oct 2016

The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Award of Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Involved in Factory Altercation. The court held that the domestic enquiry was fair and the compensation of 30 months' wages was appropriate under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

19 Apr 2005

The petition was filed by the Rayon Workers' Union and the workman, Dinesh Pratap Singh, challenging the award of the 4th Labour Court at Thane in Ref...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Industrial Court's Rejection of Interim Relief in ULP Complaint Over Jurisdiction Under Schedule II of MRTU & PULP Act. Workers Alleged Forced Resignations and Unfair Labour Practices; Court Framed Issues on Whether Industrial Court Could Consider Terminations Under Schedule II.

3 Jul 2019

(1) Background: The dispute arose from an industrial complaint filed by eleven workers against their employer, M/s Motherson Advanced Tooling Solution...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)